USPTO serial 78970838
Serial No. 78970838
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRODY, DANIEL S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 78970838?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mart Enn Koppel
68 Bell Streetc/o L.ChristmannLaconia, NH 03246-2305Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Alcoholic bitters; Brandy; Champagne; Cognac; Distilled Spirits; Fruit wine; Gin; Grape wine; Hard cider; Liqueurs; Potable spirits; Prepared alcoholic cocktail; Rum; Sake ; Sparkling fruit wine; Sparkling grape wine; Tequila; Vermouth; Vodka; Wine | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 4, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 3, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 17, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |