USPTO serial 78971012
ICE BREAKER *#
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROSSMAN, WILLIAM M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ICE BREAKER *#?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
George Town, KY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James J. Pingor
James J. Pingor Kegler Brown Hill & Ritter Co., LPA600 Superior Avenue EastSuite 1300Cleveland, OH 44114Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 045 | SOCIAL NETWORKING SERVICES, NAMELY, INTERNET AND MOBILE NETWORK BASED SOCIAL NETWORKING , INTRODUCTION AND DATING SERVICES VIA MOBILE COMMUNICATIVE DEVICES SUCH AS MOBILE PHONES; ONLINE SOCIAL NETWORKING SERVICES VIA MOBILE COMMUNICATIVE DEVICES SUCH AS MOBILE PHONES; PROVIDING A DATABASE FEATURING INFORMATION REGARDING SOCIAL NETWORKING SERVICES, NAMELY, PERSONAL ADS, LOVE, ROMANCE AND DATING SERVICES | ACTIVE | Aug 29, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 21, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 26, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 17, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 13, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 16, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |