USPTO serial 78971993
WOOW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWERS, ALEXANDER L
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WOOW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donna J. Bunton
DONNA J BUNTON NIXON & VANDERHYE901 N GLEBE RD FL 11ARLINGTON, VA 22203-1853UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER GAME SOFTWARE; GAMING MACHINES; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR GAMING MACHINES | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | PROCEDURE MANUALS FOR PLAYING CASINO GAMES | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | EQUIPMENT FOR PLAYING CASINO GAMES, NAMELY, LAYOUT CLOTHS; CASINO CARD GAMES; PLAYER ADVICE CARDS FOR PLAYING CASINO GAMES | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES IN THE NATURE OF CASINO GAMES; PROVIDING ON-LINE CASINO GAMES AND GAMES OF CHANCE; AND PROVIDING ON-LINE CASINO TYPE COMPUTER GAMES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Prime Table Games LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Prime Table Games LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named WOOW
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 17, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 20, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 16, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 18, 2009 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | RGEX | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | PRRR | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | PRRG | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST GRANTED | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jun 12, 2009 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 18, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 18, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 16, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 29, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 16, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 24, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 4, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 5, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |