USPTO serial 78972043
Serial No. 78972043
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHOE, KELLY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 78972043?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timothy P. Whelan
TIMOTHY P WHELAN LAW OFFICE OF TIMOTHY P WHELAN1200 ROOSEVELT RD STE 150GLEN ELLYN, IL 60137-7807UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | jewelry, necklace; belt bckles, book markers, bracelets, brooches, clock dials, charity bracelets, charms, cuff-links, chokers, earrings | ACTIVE | Apr 5, 2002 |
| 018 | briefcases, bookbags, all purposes sport bag, athletic bags, attache cases, business caes, calling card cases, clutch bag | ACTIVE | Apr 5, 2002 |
| 025 | shirts, jackets, caps, bandanas, cap visor, belts | ACTIVE | Apr 5, 2002 |
| 041 | books,conducting workshops,arranging seminars and conferences | ACTIVE | Apr 5, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 24, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 12, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |