USPTO serial 78972156
REALISE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MIDDLETON, BERNICE L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with REALISE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Westminster, CO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph R. Enzor
JOSEPH R ENZOR ENZOR LAW GROUP PC4450 ARAPAHOE AVE STE 100BOULDER, CO 80303-9102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Appraisal of real estate; Assessment and management of real estate; Financial investment in the field of real estate; Land acquisition, namely, real estate brokerage; Leasing of real estate; Real estate acquisition services; Real estate agencies; Real estate appraisal; Real estate brokerage; Real estate escrow services; Real estate investment; Real estate listing; Real estate procurement for others; Real estate syndication | ACTIVE | Nov 1, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 5, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 3, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |