Drawing for AKROMATIC

USPTO serial 78972600

AKROMATIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LUKEN, BONNIE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AKROMATIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anthony P. Venturino

ANTHONY P. VENTURINO Novak Druce + Quigg LLP1300 I Street, NW1000 West TowerWashington, DC 20005

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Metal doors; metal door structural and replacement parts, namely, metal door rollers; metal door guide rails, metal door guide rails incorporating security locks, metal door drive chains, door drive belt tensioners, metal door cables and metal door pulleysACTIVE—
007Door motors; door drivesACTIVE—
009Door operators, namely, electric door operators; door controls, namely remote controls for doors; electrical door controllers; door touch key pads, door switches, namely, electronic door motor switches for switching on door motors; door light beam safety devices, namely, laser detectors for sensing if there is an object in the way of the closing door; door remote controller digital transmitters, and door radio receiversACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 8, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 8, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 18, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 8, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 16, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 26, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 11, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 7, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 21, 2007DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Aug 10, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 9, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 9, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 9, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 9, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 2, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 6, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 13, 2006AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Nov 13, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 18, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance