USPTO serial 78972608
VARSITY JOE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WIENER, MICHAEL
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VARSITY JOE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William C. Wright
William C. Wright Epstein Drangel Bazerman & James, LLP60 East 42nd StreetSuite 820New York, NY 10165Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing, namely, pants, jeans, sweatpants, shirts, polo shirts, dress shirts, sweatshirts, t-shirts, underwear, jumpers, blouses, skirts, shorts, swimwear, and bathing suits; shoes; slippers; sneakers; boots; socks; hosiery; belts; outerwear, namely, jackets, leather jackets, ski jackets, and vests; suits; ties; school uniforms; dresses; gloves; hats; scarves; pajamas; robes; nightshirts; overalls; coveralls; creepers; leggings; sweaters; snowsuits; layettes; gowns; short alls; blanket sleepers, knit tops; knit bottoms; sweat suits; warm-up suits; cloth bibs | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2009 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 24, 2009 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 24, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 24, 2009 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 15, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 11, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 31, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 16, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 16, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |