USPTO serial 78972784
MIRAGE LIBERTY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLAYTON, CHERYL A
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MIRAGE LIBERTY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Bella Vista, NSW, AU
Bella Vista, NSW, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michelle L. Mehok
Michelle L. Mehok Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP12255 El Camino Real, Suite 300San Diego, CA 92130-4088UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Medical instruments namely patient interface products, namely, nasal masks, full face masks, nasal prongs, nasal cannulae, nasal pillows, nasal seals and parts and accessories therefor, all for use with medical equipment for treating sleep disordered breathing | ABANDONED | May 1, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 2009 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 16, 2009 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 16, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 16, 2009 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 21, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 4, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | ZZAX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE WITHDRAWN-TIMELY AAU | — |
| Jun 16, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 9, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 14, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 14, 2007 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 31, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 31, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |