USPTO serial 78972808
RUPTURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLIS, PAMELA Y
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RUPTURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
REDWOOD CITY, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jacob Schatz
Jacob Schatz Electronic Arts Inc.209 Redwood Shores ParkwayLegal Dept.Redwood City, CA 94065Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Computerized on-line retail store services in the field of computer hardware, computer software, computer game and video game hardware and software, computer and video game peripherals, games-related merchandise, books, computer products, apparel and clothing, and entertainment technology; Providing consumer information in the field of computer game and video game hardware and software, computer and video game peripherals, games-related merchandise, computer products, and entertainment technology | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 1, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 6, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 1, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 26, 2009 | UNTD | REQUEST TO DIVIDE UNTIMELY, REFUSED, OR WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 29, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 29, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 25, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 24, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 21, 2007 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 11, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |