USPTO serial 78973059
RECOVER TECHNIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MILLER, DAVID S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RECOVER TECHNIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan L. Daugherty
SUSAN L DAUGHERTY DRIGGS, HOGG & FRY CO LPA38500 CHARDON RDWILLOUGHBY HILLS, OH 44094UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemicals for removing organic coatings and organic films, soils and deposits from metallic and non-metallic substrates, namely industrial, commercial and automotive products | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | Machines for cleaning utilizing immersion tanks or spray application of chemicals within an enclosed chamber to surfaces to be cleaned | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2007 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |