Drawing for WATER IQ

USPTO serial 78973122

WATER IQ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WATER IQ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bruce Perkins

BRUCE PERKINS FRITZ, BYRNE, HEAD & HARRISON LLP98 SAN JACINTO BLVD STE 2000AUSTIN, TX 78701-4288UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Promoting public awareness of the need for conservation of waterABANDONEDJan 25, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 15, 2008MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jan 15, 2008ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Dec 18, 2007EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jul 23, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jul 17, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 27, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 2, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 1, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 19, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 19, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 19, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 16, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 12, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 12, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 19, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance