USPTO serial 78973630
SUPER B
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUPER B?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Herbert F. Bohnet, Esq.
Emilia F. Cannella ROPES & GRAY LLPPrudential Tower, 800 Boylston StreetBoston, MA 02199-3600UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | recreational vehicles, namely, motor homes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 26, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 31, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2011 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 25, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 23, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 13, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 23, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 23, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 28, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 11, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 24, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 23, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 23, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 24, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 13, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |