Drawing for DESIGNED IN THE REPUBLIC OF CALIFORNIA

USPTO serial 78975034

DESIGNED IN THE REPUBLIC OF CALIFORNIA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2875110Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 17, 2004
Examiner
KRISP, JENNIFER MARIE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with DESIGNED IN THE REPUBLIC OF CALIFORNIA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James F. Herkenhoff

James F. Herkenhoff Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP2040 Main Street, 14th FloorIrvine, CA 92614UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025SHIRTS, T-SHIRTS, HATS, BEANIES, VISORS, JACKETS, SHOESSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDOct 1, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 18, 2011C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Oct 11, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 11, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 17, 2004R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 25, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 5, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 20, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 20, 2004IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Jan 5, 2004AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 22, 2003IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Sep 22, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 19, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 1, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 14, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 7, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 19, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 7, 2003DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 13, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 22, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2002DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance