USPTO serial 78975275
NUTRISYSTEM NEW GLYCEMIC INDEX PROGRAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORDOVA, RAUL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NUTRISYSTEM NEW GLYCEMIC INDEX PROGRAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | VITAMINS, MINERAL SUPPLEMENTS, NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENTS, PROTEIN SUPPLEMENTS, HERBAL SUPPLEMENTS OR MEAL REPLACEMENT POWDERS AND DRINKS, USED IN CONNECTION WITH A WEIGHT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Nutri/System IPHC, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Nutri/System IPHC, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named NUTRISYSTEM NEW GLYCEMIC INDEX PROGRAM
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 20, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 18, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 9, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 9, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 9, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 1, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 12, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 12, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 11, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 22, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 2, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 16, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 18, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 18, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2003 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 18, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 2003 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |