USPTO serial 78975406
MC CORMICK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2981190Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 2, 2005
- Examiner
- CHARLON, BARNEY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MC CORMICK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert W. Sacoff, Esq.
Robert W. Sacoff PATTISHALL, MCAULIFFE, NEWBURY, HILLIARD & GERALDS200 S. WACKER DR STE 2900CHICAGO, IL 60606-6631UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Toy wagons, toy harrows, toy plows, toy tractors and toy trucks | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 20, 1987 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CNH AMERICA LLC
- Other trademarks owned by CNH Global N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by CNH Global N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by CNH Global N.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named MC CORMICK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 10, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 20, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 26, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 27, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 16, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 16, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 18, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 2, 2004 | GNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2004 | AAUD | AMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 16, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 3, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 7, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |