Drawing for QUARTET

USPTO serial 78975407

QUARTET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3254326Status 800Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 19, 2007
Examiner
BORSUK, ESTHER
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Status 800: Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection.

Need help with QUARTET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Julie A. LaBunski

Julie A. LaBunski ACCO Brands CorporationFour Corporate DriveLake Zurich, IL 60047United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016EaselsACTIVEJun 30, 1993

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 19, 2026REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
May 13, 2025TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 13, 2025ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 13, 2025REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 13, 2025CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 13, 2025COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Oct 30, 2024ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 29, 2017NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Jun 29, 2017RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Jun 29, 201789AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Jun 29, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 19, 2017E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 13, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 19, 2016REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Jun 15, 2013NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jun 15, 2013C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jun 15, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 3, 2013E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
May 22, 2013ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 9, 2013CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 9, 2013COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2013ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 20, 2013ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jul 11, 2012ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 13, 2012ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 4, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 28, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 14, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 7, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 19, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 14, 2007REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 13, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 23, 2007CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Mar 5, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 3, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 3, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 29, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2006CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2006SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 5, 2006IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Sep 5, 2006EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Aug 9, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 9, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 6, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 6, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 6, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 14, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 25, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 19, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 19, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 9, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 8, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 27, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 27, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 27, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 27, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 26, 2004GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 2, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 2, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 30, 2004DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 29, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2004DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 6, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 31, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 7, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 16, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 17, 2002GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 21, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 21, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 17, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 14, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 11, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance