Drawing for THE APPRENTICE

USPTO serial 78976191

THE APPRENTICE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE APPRENTICE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Frank M.Weyer, James M. Slominski, Todd N. Snyder, Catherine S. Sun, Maurice B. Pilosof, Obi I. Iloputaife

GARY A HECKER THE HECKER LAW GROUP PLC1925 CENTURY PARK E STE 2300LOS ANGELES, CA 90067UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Toys, namely, action skill games, action figures and accessories therefore, action target games, manipulative games and puzzles, mechanical action toys, electric action toys, battery operated action toys, wind-up toys, talking toys, hand held unit for playing video games, jigsaw puzzles, and toy figuresACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 14, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 11, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 11, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 27, 2007EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Nov 27, 2007EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Feb 1, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 23, 2006RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Jan 23, 2006CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jan 19, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 19, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 12, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 12, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 8, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 7, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 10, 2005DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 18, 2005DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
May 18, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 27, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 27, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 5, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 23, 2005UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 18, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 18, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 16, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 15, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 30, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance