Drawing for TASTE OF ·I·N·D·I·A·

USPTO serial 78976357

TASTE OF ·I·N·D·I·A·

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3215911Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 6, 2007
Examiner
MEIER, SHARON A
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with TASTE OF ·I·N·D·I·A·?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Meat, fish, poultry and game, meat extracts; preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies, jams, fruit sauces, eggs, milk and milk products, namely, butter and cheese; edible oils and fatsSECTION 8 - CANCELLED
030Milk products, namely, ice creamSECTION 8 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 11, 2013C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)
Mar 6, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 13, 2007OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Jan 13, 2007OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999
Apr 1, 2006OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Dec 2, 2005ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Nov 8, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 19, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Sep 23, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Sep 8, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 25, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 22, 2005DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Aug 9, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 8, 2005DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
Aug 8, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 5, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 13, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 13, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 25, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 14, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Sep 29, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 29, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 29, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Nov 18, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 18, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 14, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 22, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 22, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 22, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 20, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 30, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance