USPTO serial 78976399
THE BARKER TWINS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3033180Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 20, 2005
- Examiner
- WOOD, CAROLINE
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE BARKER TWINS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New York, NY, US
NEW YORK, NY, US
NEW YORK, NY, US
New York, NY, US
NEW YORK, NY, US
NEW YORK, NY, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ronald S. Kadden
Ronald S. Kadden Leydig, Voit & Mayer, Ltd.180 N. Stetson AveSuite 4900Chicago, IL 60601-6745Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Children's books [, activity books for children, children's books packaged with stickers] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 15, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PENGUIN RANDOM HOUSE LLC
- Other trademarks owned by PENGUIN GROUP (USA) INC.
- Other trademarks owned by PENGUIN HOUSE (USA) INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Penguin Putnam Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by PENGUIN GROUP (USA) INC.
- Other trademarks owned by PENGUIN RANDOM HOUSE LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named THE BARKER TWINS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 3, 2026 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 20, 2024 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 20, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2021 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2018 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2018 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2016 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Feb 8, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Feb 4, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 18, 2015 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 10, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 8, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 28, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 22, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 30, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 10, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 19, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 17, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 7, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 5, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 20, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |