USPTO serial 78977812
MSC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 26, 2008
- Examiner
- KEARNEY, COLLEEN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MSC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Marketing Software Company, Inc.
Woodland Hills, CA
Marketing Software Company, Inc.
Woodland Hills, CA
Marketing Software Company, Inc.
Woodland Hills, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tawnya R. Wojciechowski
TAWNYA R WOJCIECHOWSKI TRW LAW GROUP199000 MACARTHUR BLVD STE 1150IRVINE, CA 92612-8433UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Data processing services; customer mailing list preparation in the field of advertising and direct response marketing; providing an on-line computer database for data retrieval and customer list selections in the field of advertising and direct response marketing | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 5, 1989 |
| 042 | Customized software development services in the field of database management and maintenance; customized software development services in the field of advertising and marketing, namely, the preparation of standardized or custom reports based on customer-specified marketing parameters; document data transfer from one computer format to another; computer software consulting services for creating sales lead generational software and demographics software in the field of advertising and direct response marketing | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 5, 1989 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Marketing Software Company, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Marketing Software Company, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Marketing Software Company, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MSC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 10, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 21, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 2, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 2, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 2, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 18, 2006 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 30, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 27, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 27, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 27, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 4, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 26, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 4, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |