USPTO serial 78977873
HUMAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VOHRA, SANJEEV KUMAR
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HUMAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics and personal care products, namely, perfume and cologne | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2007 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 6, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 6, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 24, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 31, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |