USPTO serial 78978151
SAFE-D-POSIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3305048Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 2, 2007
- Examiner
- STEEL, ALYSSA PALADINO
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SAFE-D-POSIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Stuhlbarg International Sales Company, Inc. d/b/a Sisco, Inc.
Rancho Dominguez, CA
Other trademarks owned by Stuhlbarg International Sales Company, Inc. d/b/a Sisco, Inc.
Stuhlbarg International Sales Company, Inc. d/b/a Sisco, Inc.
Rancho Dominguez, CA
Other trademarks owned by Stuhlbarg International Sales Company, Inc. d/b/a Sisco, Inc.
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | METAL SAFES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Stuhlbarg International Sales Company, Inc. d/b/a Sisco, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Stuhlbarg International Sales Company, Inc. d/b/a Sisco, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Similar marks named SAFE-D-POSIT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 4, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 4, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 24, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 24, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | RGIA | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 2, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 2, 2007 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 3, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 21, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |