USPTO serial 78978393
SPACLUB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 3, 2007
- Examiner
- WOOD, CAROLINE
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with SPACLUB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Tucson, AZ, US
Tucson, AZ, US
Tucson, AZ, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer A. Van Kirk
Jennifer A. Van Kirk Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP201 East Washington Street, Suite 1200PHOENIX, AZ 85004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | Counseling and consulting services in the fields of nutrition, wellness, prevention of disease, beauty and skin care; hair styling and skin care salon services; manicure and pedicure services; health spa services, namely, cosmetic body care services; massage; health spa services for health and wellness of the body and spirit offered at a health resort; maintaining files and records concerning the health and wellness of individuals; operation of sauna facilities; providing information in the fields of nutrition, wellness, prevention of disease, beauty, skin care | ACTIVE | Jun 30, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 3, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2017 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 26, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 24, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 15, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 28, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 28, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 31, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 31, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 14, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 1, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 28, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 28, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 21, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 15, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 31, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 8, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 19, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 30, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 15, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 28, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |