USPTO serial 78978966
LAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3485049Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 12, 2008
- Examiner
- BESCH, JAY C
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lauri S. Thompson
Lauri S. Thompson Greenspun Traurig, LLP3773 Howard Hughes ParkwaySuite 400NLas Vegas, NV 89169Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HOLLYWOOD BAR, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by HOLLYWOOD BAR, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by HOLLYWOOD BAR, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Adam Goldstein
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named LAX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 2019 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 12, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 10, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2014 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2014 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 23, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 11, 2014 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 21, 2008 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 27, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 7, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 28, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 24, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 27, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 3, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |