USPTO serial 78979520
GREEN LIGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PAPPAS, MATTHEW
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GREEN LIGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Frozen prepared meals consisting of fish, meats, vegetables; margarine substitutes; processed and canned fruits; cheese-, fruit- and vegetable-based spreads; poultry; soups and chowders; dairy products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; cheese; cooking oil, margarine; butter and substitutes therefor | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Breakfast cereals, muesli, grain-based nutrition bars; table syrup; sugarless candies; salad dressings; sauces; sugarless and fat-reduced wafers; desserts, namely, puddings, soufflés and mousses; frozen yogurt and ice cream; desserts containing pasta, namely, dessert lasagna, aletria, almond torte with risoni; breakfast cereals containing pasta | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2009 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 14, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 12, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 12, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 25, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 5, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 20, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 15, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 8, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 10, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 16, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |