USPTO serial 78979832
NON OBLITUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3514379Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 7, 2008
- Examiner
- ELTON, DAVID JONATHAN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NON OBLITUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MacTavish, Steven Edward Dugald
Oakville, Ontario, CA
MacTavish, Steven Edward Dugald
Oakville, Ontario, CA
MacTavish, Steven Edward Dugald
Oakville, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Pamela Payne Smith
Pamela Payne Smith BALCH & BINGHAM LLP1901 6TH AVE N STE 2600BIRMINGHAM, AL 35203-4644UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Publications, namely, books, magazines and newsletters regarding Scottish genealogy and history, and stationery | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 31, 1993 |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, t-shirts, polo shirts, sweatshirts, sweatpants, jackets, baseball hats, berets, tams | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MacTavish, Steven Edward Dugald
- Other trademarks owned by MacTavish, Steven Edward Dugald
- Other trademarks owned by MacTavish, Steven Edward Dugald
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named NON OBLITUS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 4, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 3, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2008 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 3, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 10, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 21, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 11, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |