USPTO serial 78979976
GAIA & GINO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DWYER, JOHN D
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GAIA & GINO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
GAIA GINO AKSESUAR TASARIM ANONIM SIRKETI
MACKA 34367 ISTANBUL, TR
Other trademarks owned by GAIA GINO AKSESUAR TASARIM ANONIM SIRKETI
Decorum Dekorasyon Tekstil Anonim Sirketi
Nisantasi, TR
Other trademarks owned by Decorum Dekorasyon Tekstil Anonim Sirketi
Decorum Dekorasyon Tekstil Anonim Sirketi
Nisantasi, TR
Other trademarks owned by Decorum Dekorasyon Tekstil Anonim Sirketi
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Claudia Cantarella, Esq.
Claudia Cantarella, Esq. SalansRockefeller Center, 620 Fifth AvenueNew York, NY 10020UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GAIA GINO AKSESUAR TASARIM ANONIM SIRKETI
- Other trademarks owned by Decorum Dekorasyon Tekstil Anonim Sirketi
- Other trademarks owned by Decorum Dekorasyon Tekstil Anonim Sirketi
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named GAIA & GINO
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 21, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 20, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 18, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 27, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 7, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 19, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 26, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 13, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 18, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 18, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 18, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |