Drawing for BILTMORE

USPTO serial 78980605

BILTMORE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BAKER, JORDAN A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BILTMORE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

J. Bennett Mullinax

J BENNETT MULLINAX J BENNETT MULLINAX LLCPO BOX 26029GREENVILLE, SC 29616-1029UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Jewelry, namely, rings, earrings, necklaces, bracelets, pins, and pendants made of precious metalsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 7, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 6, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 2, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 10, 2009NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 10, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 2, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 1, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 19, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 19, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 19, 2009GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 19, 2009GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 19, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 12, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 12, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 12, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 12, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 4, 2008MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Sep 3, 2008DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 3, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 29, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 29, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 25, 2008DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Aug 25, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 24, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 17, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 17, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 17, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 2, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 21, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 21, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 21, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 26, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 23, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 23, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 23, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 4, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 6, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 6, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 6, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 17, 2006MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Aug 16, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance