USPTO serial 78980663
HORST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3665214Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 4, 2009
- Examiner
- CHANG, KATHERINE S
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HORST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
OSCEOLA, WI
OSCEOLA, WI
OSCEOLA, WI
Minneapolis, MN
MINNEAPOLIS, MN
HORST M. RECHELBACHER REVOCABLE TRUST U/A DATED SEPTEMBER 30, 2011 AS AMENDED AND RESTATED
MINNEAPOLIS, MN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sherri L. Rohlf, Esq.
Sherri L. Rohlf, Esq. SIEGEL, BRILL, GREUPNER, DUFFY & FOSTER,100 WASHINGTON AVE S STE 1300MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401-2191UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Personal hygiene products, namely, fragrances for personal use, body oils and lotions; perfumes and colognes; and room fragrances | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 1, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RECHELBACHER, HORST
- Other trademarks owned by RECHELBACHER, HORST
- Other trademarks owned by RECHELBACHER, HORST
- Other trademarks owned by Intelligent Nutrients, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by INTELLIGENT NUTRIENTS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by HORST M. RECHELBACHER REVOCABLE TRUST U/A DATED SEPTEMBER 30, 2011 AS AMENDED AND RESTATED
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named HORST
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 13, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 6, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 4, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 1, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 19, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 13, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 15, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2008 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 10, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 5, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 5, 2008 | UNTD | REQUEST TO DIVIDE UNTIMELY, REFUSED, OR WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 20, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 20, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 5, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 28, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 8, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |