USPTO serial 78980940
DEL SUR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 17, 2009
- Examiner
- BOONE, JOHN C
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with DEL SUR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MEDLEY, FL
MEDLEY, FL
MIAMI, FL
Miami, FL
Miami, FL
Miami, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ury Fischer
URY FISCHER LOTT & FISCHER, PLP.O. Box 141098Coral Gables, FL 33114-1098UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Processed canned and bottled fruit, namely, guava cream, guava paste, sweet tomatoes, figs, and soursop; Canned and bottled vegetables, namely, potatoes, beans, olives, and peppers; Canned sardines; Condensed milk and evaporated milk; Frozen fruit pulp; Plantain chips; Cooking oil | ACTIVE | Jan 31, 2006 |
| 030 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Sugar; Brown sugar; Caramel; Corn flour mix; Vanilla extract; Hard candy; Coffee beans; Ground coffee; Canned and bottled corn | ACTIVE | Jan 31, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DEL SUR BRAND LLC
- Other trademarks owned by DEL SUR PRODUCTS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by BLUE ROOF BRANDS LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Logistic Alliance, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Logistic Alliance, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Logistic Alliance, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named DEL SUR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2019 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2019 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Apr 18, 2019 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Apr 18, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 20, 2019 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 18, 2019 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2015 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2015 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 30, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 17, 2015 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 10, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 11, 2009 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 18, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 26, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 6, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 19, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 28, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 30, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 29, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 16, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 25, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 27, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |