USPTO serial 78980984
STAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAITO, KIM
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Equipment for processing fly ash, namely, machines for beneficiating, mixing, blending and fabricating fly ash | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by The Sefa Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by The Sefa Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by The Sefa Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named STAR
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 16, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 22, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 16, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 20, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 4, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 29, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 29, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 24, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 4, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 22, 2006 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 22, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |