USPTO serial 78980992
FARM BOY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 5, 2009
- Examiner
- RHIM, ANDREW
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FARM BOY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
White Bear Lake, MN
St. Paul, MN
St. Paul, MN
SAINT PAUL, MN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John Pickerill
John Pickerill FREDRIKSON & BYRON PA200 S 6TH STSTE 4000MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-1425Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | Towels, bed blankets, throw blankets, textile blankets, bed sheets, household linen, pillowcases, quilts, comforters, duvet covers, bed spreads, shams, dust ruffles; embroidered textile wall hangings; curtains, draperies; bath linens, kitchen linens; laundry textiles, namely, textile place mats for use in the laundry, household linens, towels, dish cloths, textile napkins, table cloths not of paper; place mats not of paper, pot holders, oven mitts | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 21, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FARM BOY CO-OP & FEED CO.
- Other trademarks owned by Adamson, Daniel John
- Other trademarks owned by Adamson, Daniel John
- Other trademarks owned by FARM BOY CO-OP & FEED CO.
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named FARM BOY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2019 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 5, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2015 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2015 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2015 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2015 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 16, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 5, 2015 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 30, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 10, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 7, 2008 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 11, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 21, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 1, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |