Drawing for BOTASAN

USPTO serial 79000001

BOTASAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELL, MARLENE D
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BOTASAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemicals for the use in cosmetics industry; raw materials for use in the cosmetics industry, namely, vegetable extractsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
003Cosmetic products containing vegetable raw materials, namely, deodorants, decorative cosmetics, hair-care, skin care and oral care cosmeticSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 30, 2014DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
May 29, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 5, 2011CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 2, 2009NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2006FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 17, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 16, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 8, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 6, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 30, 2005OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 30, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 29, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 29, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 29, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 29, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 26, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 25, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 17, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 16, 2003REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance