USPTO serial 79000048
OPENURL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOYNER, CHARLES G
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OPENURL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Communications by mobile telephone, communications by telex, communications by computer terminals, communications by telegrams, communications by telephone, communications by facsimile, paging services, television broadcasting, cable television broadcasting, radio broadcasting, satellite television broadcasting, satellite data broadcasting | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 8, 2010 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 14, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 29, 2004 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2003 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |