USPTO serial 79000069
THINKING AHEAD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MEIER, SHARON A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THINKING AHEAD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Non-metal building materials, namely, tar based asphalt patching compound, tar based asphalt sealants; bricks; concrete building materials, namely, blocks, bricks, posts, panels, and slabs; board material made of polyethylene used as a wood substitute; plastic pipe supports; wallboard for construction purposes; window casements not of metal; door casings not of metal; non-metal door frames, non-metal door panels, non-metal door units; non-metal casting forms for concrete; ceiling panels not of metal; roofing cement; non-metal chimneys; concrete; concrete drain pipes; non-metal expansion joints for floors and walls; non-metal floors, concrete floors, non-metal floor tiles; non-metal gates; non-metal garage doors; non-metal sliding doors; non-metal roofing; non-metal scaffolding; shingles; non-metal rails; sheathing board; non-metal exterior building shutters; skylights, staircases; non-metal suspended ceiling panels; vinyl siding; wood siding; window casements not of metal; window frames not of metal; window panes, window shutters not of metal; window sills not of metal; wood beams; wood joints; wood joists; wood posts; wood siding; wood trim | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | Construction and renovation of buildings; custom construction of homes, factories, and commercial buildings; residential, commercial and industrial building construction; rental of construction and building equipment; leasing of construction and building equipment; building construction and repair | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 3, 2014 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jun 14, 2014 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2014 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 10, 2007 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 20, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 7, 2005 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 6, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 17, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2004 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |