Drawing for THE LONDON LOOK

USPTO serial 79000141

THE LONDON LOOK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3050931Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 24, 2006
Examiner
PIGNATELLO, ELIZABETH
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE LONDON LOOK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Elisheva Jasie

Elisheva Jasie Coty Inc.2 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10016-5675UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Soaps; [perfumery;] essential oils; cosmetics[; hair lotions]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 10, 2024DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jun 10, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 19, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 16, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 12, 2017ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
May 1, 2017INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 1, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Apr 26, 2017INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Aug 26, 2016C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Mar 27, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 21, 2014INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jan 15, 2014INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Nov 29, 2013RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Feb 14, 2013INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 14, 2012NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
May 14, 201271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
May 14, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 19, 2011ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Apr 10, 2008DCPNCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Sep 28, 2006FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 11, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 11, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 5, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 24, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 1, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 12, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 1, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 26, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 25, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 8, 2005CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jul 21, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2005OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 23, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 23, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 10, 2005OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 10, 2005OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 21, 2005NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 17, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 9, 2004REINREINSTATED—
Dec 9, 2004UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 9, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 9, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 23, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 14, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance