Drawing for MISSING LINK

USPTO serial 79000201

MISSING LINK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
OH, WON TEAK
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MISSING LINK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Sunglasses, optical glasses, spectacle frames, spectacle lenses, contact lenses, spectacle casesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
014WatchesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 30, 2014DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
May 29, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Nov 30, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jul 26, 2007CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Jun 1, 2006FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
May 17, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
May 16, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Aug 15, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 12, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 14, 2005OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 23, 2005OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jun 23, 2005OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 5, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 4, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 15, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Dec 3, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 3, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 13, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 1, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 25, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 23, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Jan 15, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance