Drawing for NDIS

USPTO serial 79000228

NDIS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2925477Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 8, 2005
Examiner
ADKINS, CHRISTOPHER
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NDIS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Karl M. Zielaznicki, Esq.

KARL M ZIELAZNICKI ESQ C/O TRADEMARK DOCKET CLERKTROUTMAN SANDERS LLP600 PEACHTREE ST NE STE 5200ATLANTA, GA 30308-2216

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Data base search engine softwareSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
041Training in the field of data base search engine software applicability and data processingSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Development and maintenance of data base search engine software; computer software consultation in the field of data base search engine software applicability and data processingSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 12, 2011DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 9, 2011C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Mar 7, 2011REINREINSTATED—
Feb 25, 2011C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Feb 24, 2011REINREINSTATED—
Feb 18, 2011C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Aug 31, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 15, 2007NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 14, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 14, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 31, 2006FISNFINAL DECISION PROCESSED AND SENT TO IB—
Dec 31, 2005CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 8, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 16, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 27, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 19, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 27, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 27, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 19, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 6, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 6, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 6, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 23, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 15, 2004SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance