Drawing for NIRVANOLIDE

USPTO serial 79000230

NIRVANOLIDE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3071170Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 21, 2006
Examiner
GEORGE, DAHLIA
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NIRVANOLIDE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kathryn E. Smith

KATHRYN E. SMITH WOOD HERRON & EVANS LLP441 VINE STREET2700 CAREW TOWERCINCINNATI, OH 45202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemical products for use in the manufacture of perfume and cosmetic compositionsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 2, 2026C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Mar 21, 2025REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 14, 2021RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Feb 20, 2016NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Feb 20, 201671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Feb 18, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Mar 21, 2015REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 12, 2012NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jun 12, 201271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 12, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 21, 2012ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Oct 14, 2011RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Nov 10, 2006FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 23, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 23, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 10, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 21, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 21, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 27, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 7, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 8, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 28, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 27, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 12, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 5, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 4, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 4, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 27, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 27, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 14, 2005OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 23, 2005OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 23, 2005OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 25, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 24, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 11, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 13, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 13, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 15, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 23, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 15, 2004SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance