Drawing for MAXFIELD

USPTO serial 79000323

MAXFIELD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
TAYLOR, DAVID T
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAXFIELD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Photographic, cinematographic, optical, measuring, controlling and instructional apparatus and instruments; devices for the recording, transmission and reproduction of sound and image; magnetic data carriers, recording disks; data processing apparatus and computersSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
038Telecommunications; transmission of product offers via the InternetSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
042Design and development of computer hardware and softwareSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 29, 2014UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN
May 30, 2014DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
May 29, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jul 10, 2008NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Aug 30, 2007NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jul 12, 2007NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
May 11, 2006FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 10, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Apr 7, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 17, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 17, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 29, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 16, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 9, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Feb 5, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance