Drawing for AURA

USPTO serial 79000421

AURA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3499200Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 9, 2008
Examiner
HOLTZ, ALLISON
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with AURA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Timothy H. Hiebert

Timothy H. Hiebert Samuels & Hiebert LLCTwo International Place, Suite 2330Boston, MA 02110-4104UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
024Textile goods such as napery, namely, table linens, table covers, serviettes and tea towels; bed linens, bed sheets, pillow cases, quilt covers [, bed spreads and valances ] [ ; and window covers, namely, curtains and drapes ]ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 23, 2023RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jan 1, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2018INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 21, 2018INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 21, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
May 15, 2018INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 15, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Sep 15, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Sep 10, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 16, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 30, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 19, 2014NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jul 19, 2014C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jul 19, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 7, 2014ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jan 3, 2014RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Dec 29, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 20, 2009LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 19, 2009LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Jan 6, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 6, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 9, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 9, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 24, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 4, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 19, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 13, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 13, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 13, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 13, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 13, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 30, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 30, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 30, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 30, 2008ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 27, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 8, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 8, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 29, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 4, 2007CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 4, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 2, 2007RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 2, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 18, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 10, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 10, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 6, 2006CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Sep 30, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 28, 2005OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 7, 2005OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 7, 2005OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 28, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 26, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 11, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 24, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 24, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 2004ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Oct 7, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 3, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 7, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 13, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Feb 9, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance