USPTO serial 79000485
NONSTOP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MATTESSICH, DANIELLE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NONSTOP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | Agricultural and horticultural products, namely seeds, live plants, parts of plants and natural flowers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2022 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 28, 2012 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2012 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 2, 2012 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 25, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 19, 2004 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2004 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 29, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 13, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |