USPTO serial 79000497
MOODS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FOSTER, STEVEN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MOODS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 034 | RAW TOBACCO; SMOKING, CHEWING AND SNUFF TOBACCO; CIGARS,CIGARILLOS, SWISS CIGARS, CIGARETTES; CIGARETTE FILTERS, CIGARETTE TUBES, CIGARETTE PAPERS; SMOKER'S REQUISITES, ALL OF THESE GOODS NOT MADE OF PRECIOUS METAL OR PLATED THEREWITH, NAMELY, PIPES, TOBACCO POUCHES, PIPE HOLDERS, PIPE CLEANERS, CIGAR CUTTERS, CIGAR AND CIGARETTE HOLDERS, CASES AND ASHTRAYS FOR TOBACCO GOODS, LIGHTERS; POCKET MACHINES FOR ROLLING AND STUFFING CIGARETTES; CIGARETTE AND CIGAR BOXES AND CHESTS NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL; TOBACCO HUMIDIFIERS AND APPARATUS; ACCESSORY USED FOR SNUFF TOBACCO, NAMELY,FLASKS, CONTAINERS OF WOOD, METAL (NOT PRECIOUS METAL), IVORY AND PLASTIC FOR SNUFF; AND MATCHES | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2015 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 10, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 21, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 21, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 17, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 17, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 19, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2005 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 17, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2004 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 15, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 13, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |