Drawing for BON BEANIES

USPTO serial 79000577

BON BEANIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3029228Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 13, 2005
Examiner
OSBORNE, STANLEY
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BON BEANIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Milk and milk products, namely, milk powder and condensed milk; beverages and foodstuffs, namely, milk beverages with high milk content, milk beverages containing fruits, and milk-based beverage containing coffeeSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
030Coffee; tea; cocoa; artificial coffee; beverages and foodstuffs, namely, coffee-based beverage containing milk and cocoa beverages with milk; confectionary chips for bakingSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 29, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 1, 2023CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Jul 23, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 2, 2023CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 13, 2023ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Apr 3, 2014INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Feb 27, 2014INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Dec 19, 2013RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Mar 20, 2013INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jul 20, 2012C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Sep 28, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 1, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 1, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 28, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 13, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 20, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 31, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 4, 2005OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 14, 2005OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 14, 2005OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 2, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 27, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 20, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 2, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 1, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 28, 2005UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 23, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 23, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 23, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 22, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 22, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 16, 2004RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 23, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 17, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Feb 12, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance