Drawing for SENSI GIORGIO ARMANI WHITE NOTES

USPTO serial 79000631

SENSI GIORGIO ARMANI WHITE NOTES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3059163Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 14, 2006
Examiner
WISEMAN, MICHELLE
Law office
MADRID PROCESSING UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SENSI GIORGIO ARMANI WHITE NOTES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

HERBERT DUBNO

HERBERT DUBNO THE FIRM OF KARL F ROSS PC5876 RIVERDAL AVE BOX 900BRONX, NY 10471UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Perfumery productsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 26, 2014DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jun 26, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 8, 2014INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 8, 2014INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 21, 2013INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 21, 2012C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Apr 16, 2010CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Apr 2, 2010CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 11, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 20, 2006FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 28, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 28, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 14, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 14, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 22, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 2, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 3, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 9, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 2, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 4, 2005OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 15, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 14, 2005OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 14, 2005OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 31, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 31, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 18, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 6, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 6, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 22, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 1, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 17, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Feb 12, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance