Drawing for INHORGENTA

USPTO serial 79000643

INHORGENTA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2985576Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 16, 2005
Examiner
KRISP, JENNIFER MARIE
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INHORGENTA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mei Tsang

Mei Tsang FISH & TSANG LLP2603 Main Street, Suite 1000Irvine, CA 92614UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Conducting trade fairs and trade exhibitions in the field of jewelrySECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 19, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2026C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Aug 16, 2024REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 31, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 24, 2022RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Sep 18, 2015NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 201571AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Sep 18, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 12, 2015ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Apr 11, 2012RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Dec 16, 201071AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Dec 15, 2010APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 19, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 19, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 19, 2010ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Sep 6, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 11, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 11, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 26, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 16, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 24, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 4, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 2, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 2, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 19, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 14, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 13, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 12, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 12, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 3, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 29, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 28, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 17, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 2, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 7, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 3, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 16, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 17, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Feb 12, 2004SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance