Drawing for PACT PURE ADVANCED COSMETIC TECHNOLOGY

USPTO serial 79000667

PACT PURE ADVANCED COSMETIC TECHNOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2976293Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 26, 2005
Examiner
BELLO, ZACK
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PACT PURE ADVANCED COSMETIC TECHNOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Angelo Notaro

ANGELO NOTARO NOTARO & MICHALOS PC100 DUTCH HILL RD STE 110ORANGEBURG, NY 10962UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cosmetics, namely soaps; perfumery; essential oils for personal use; hair cosmetics, namely hair beauty masks, concealers and pads; shampoos; hair care preparations; hair modeling products, namely hair gel, hair foam, hair spray and hair cream; hair lotions; hair waving preparations, neutralizers for permanent waving; hair straightening preparations; hair colors and bleaching preparations; dentifricesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 24, 2014DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jan 24, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 20, 2013INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 24, 2013INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Nov 2, 2012INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Mar 2, 2012C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Sep 6, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 12, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 11, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 25, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 26, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 3, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 13, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 10, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 4, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 28, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 27, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 12, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 12, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 23, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 22, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 22, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 9, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 9, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 26, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 21, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 12, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 17, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Feb 12, 2004SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance