Drawing for REMENSIS

USPTO serial 79000693

REMENSIS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HALL, MICHAEL E
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - DOCKET CLERK

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with REMENSIS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cosmetics, perfumery, dentifrices, soaps, hair lotionsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
005Pharmaceutical products, dietetic substances adapted for medical use, food supplements for medical useSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
044Beauty salons, beauty parlorsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 15, 2014UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Jun 14, 2014DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jun 13, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 8, 2006FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 27, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 24, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 25, 2005UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
May 16, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 19, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 19, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 13, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 23, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 24, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Feb 19, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance