Drawing for Serial No. 79000732

USPTO serial 79000732

Serial No. 79000732

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3055530Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 31, 2006
Examiner
MAYS, PAULA
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 79000732?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Bulk chemical additives for the manufacture of pharmaceuticals and veterinary preparationsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
016Pamphlets and magazines featuring the subject of bulk chemical additives for the manufacture of pharmaceuticals and veterinary preparations and biotechnology productsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
035Public relations; advertising and marketing services; advertising via electronic media and specifically the InternetSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 7, 2014DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Aug 7, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 1, 2014INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 1, 2014INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Nov 9, 2013CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 7, 2013INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 22, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 7, 2012C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Mar 2, 2012CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 5, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 19, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 19, 2007NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 14, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 14, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 7, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 31, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 15, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 15, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 19, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 16, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 16, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 14, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 9, 2005OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 24, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 18, 2005OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 18, 2005OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 15, 2005REINREINSTATED—
Jun 9, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 9, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 18, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 19, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Oct 7, 2004RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 8, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 4, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 24, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Feb 19, 2004REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance