USPTO serial 79000764
DA-NANG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FOSTER, STEVEN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DA-NANG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Bleaching preparations, laundering preparations; cleaning, polishing, scouring and abrasive preparations; soaps; perfumery products; cosmetic tanning preparations and products; cosmetic bath preparations; bath salts, not for medical purposes; hair lotions, products for hair care and dyeing; cosmetics; make-up products, make-up, lipsticks, mascara, foundations; nail varnish; shampoos; toiletry milks and oils | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Optical appliances and instruments, in particular corrective glasses, sunglasses, spectacle cases, contact lenses; apparatus and media for recording, transmitting and reproducing sounds or images; CD-ROMs, compact disks, DVDs; electronic games designed for use with a television set only | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 014 | Precious metals and alloys thereof; jewellery; bijouterie; precious stones; horological and chronometric instruments | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 018 | Leather and imitations thereof, handbags, evening bags, sports bags (other than those adapted to products for which they are made); travel bags, document holders, pockets (leatherware), wallets, credit card holders, coin holders, satchels, trunks and suitcases; umbrellas, parasols; leashes, whips | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 024 | Textiles, bed and table covers, bath linen (except clothing), bed linen, household linen, table linen (textile), textile towels, curtains of textile, blinds of textile, wall hangings of textile, travel rugs | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | Clothing, footwear, headwear | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 026 | Lace and embroidery, ribbons and braids; buttons, hooks and eyelets, pins and needles | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DAHAN Albert
- Other trademarks owned by HADDAD Yves Dov
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 026
- Similar marks named DA-NANG
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2014 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2014 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 18, 2006 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 23, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 18, 2005 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 28, 2005 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 28, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2005 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 24, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 24, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 1, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 9, 2004 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 2, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |